Home News About Us Contact Contributors Disclaimer Privacy Policy Help FAQ

Quick Search
My eDoc
Session History
Support Wiki
Direct access to
document ID:

          Institute: MPI für Astrophysik     Collection: Cosmology     Display Documents

ID: 12138.0, MPI für Astrophysik / Cosmology
Galaxy clusters in Hubble volume simulations: Cosmological constraints from sky survey populations
Authors:Evrard, A. E.; MacFarland, T. J.; Couchman, H. M. P.; Colberg, J. M.; Yoshida, N.; White, S. D. M.; Jenkins, A.; Frenk, C. S.; Pearce, F. R.; Peacock, J. A.; Thomas, P. A.
Date of Publication (YYYY-MM-DD):2002
Title of Journal:The Astrophysical Journal
Journal Abbrev.:Astrophys. J.
Issue / Number:1
Start Page:7
End Page:36
Review Status:Peer-review
Audience:Experts Only
Abstract / Description:We use gigaparticle N-body simulations to study galaxy cluster populations in Hubble volumes of LambdaCDM (Omega(m) = 0.3, Omega(Lambda) = 0.7) and tauCDM (Omega(m) = 1) world models. Mapping past light cones of locations in the computational space, we create mock sky surveys of dark matter structure to z similar or equal to 1.4 over 10,000 deg(2) and to z similar or equal to 0.5 over two full spheres. Calibrating the Jenkins mass function at z = 0 with samples of 1.5 million clusters, we show that the fit describes the sky survey counts to less than or similar to20% accuracy over all redshifts for systems more massive than poor galaxy groups (5 x 10(13) h(-1) M.). Fitting the observed local temperature function determines the ratio beta of specific thermal energies in dark matter and intracluster gas. We derive a scaling with power spectrum normalization beta proportional to sigma(8)(5/3) and find that the LambdaCDM model requires sigma(8) = 1.04 to match beta = 1.17 derived from gasdynamic cluster simulations. We estimate a 10% overall systematic uncertainty in sigma(8), 4% arising from cosmic variance in the local sample and the bulk from uncertainty in the absolute mass scale of clusters. Considering distant clusters, the LambdaCDM model matches Extended Medium- Sensitivity Survey and ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey X-ray selected observations under economical assumptions for intracluster gas evolution. Using transformations of mass-limited cluster samples that mimic sigma(8) variation, we explore Sunyaev- Zeldovich (SZ) search expectations for a 10 deg(2) survey complete above 10(14) h(-1) M.. Cluster counts are shown to be extremely sensitive to sigma(8) uncertainty, while redshift statistics, such as the sample median, are much more stable. Redshift information is crucial to extract the full cosmological diagnostic power of SZ cluster surveys. For LambdaCDM, the characteristic temperature at a fixed sky surface density is a weak function of redshift, implying an abundance of hot clusters at z > 1. Assuming constant beta, one 8 keV cluster at z > 2 and 10 5 keV clusters at z > 3 are expected in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey area. Too many such clusters can falsify the model; detection of clusters more massive than Coma at z > 1 violates LambdaCDM at 95% confidence if their surface density exceeds 0.003 deg(-2), or 120 on the whole sky.
Free Keywords:cosmology : theory; dark matter; galaxies : clusters : general; intergalactic medium
External Publication Status:published
Document Type:Article
Communicated by:N. N.
Affiliations:MPI für Astrophysik
External Affiliations:Univ Michigan, Dept Phys & Astron, 830 Dennison,501 E Univ Ave,; Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA; Univ Michigan, Dept Phys & Astron, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA; Rechzentrum Garching, D-85740 Garching, Germany; 1Click Brands LLC, New York, NY 10003 USA; McMaster Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M1, Canada; Max Planck Inst Astrophys, D-85740 Garching, Germany; Econovo Software, Boston, MA 02109 USA; Univ Durham, Dept Phys, Durham DH1 3LE, England; Univ Nottingham, Dept Phys & Astron, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England; Univ Edinburgh, Royal Observ, Inst Astron, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, Midlothian, Scotland; Univ Sussex, CEPS, Ctr Astron, Brighton BN1 9QJ, E Sussex, England
The scope and number of records on eDoc is subject to the collection policies defined by each institute - see "info" button in the collection browse view.