Please note that eDoc will be permanently shut down in the first quarter of 2021!      Home News About Us Contact Contributors Disclaimer Privacy Policy Help FAQ

Quick Search
My eDoc
Session History
Support Wiki
Direct access to
document ID:

          Institute: MPI für Intelligente Systeme (ehemals Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung)     Collection: Abt. Schölkopf (Empirical Inference)     Display Documents

ID: 596165.0, MPI für Intelligente Systeme (ehemals Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung) / Abt. Schölkopf (Empirical Inference)
MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods
Authors:Hofmann, M.; Bezrukov, I.; Mantlik, F.; Aschoff, P..; Steinke, F.; Beyer, T.; Pichler, B. J.; Schölkopf, B.
Date of Publication (YYYY-MM-DD):2011-09-01
Title of Journal:Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Issue / Number:9
Start Page:1392
End Page:1399
Review Status:not specified
Audience:Not Specified
Intended Educational Use:No
Abstract / Description:PET/MRI is an emerging dual-modality imaging technology that requires new approaches to PET attenuation correction (AC). We assessed 2 algorithms for whole-body MRI-based AC (MRAC): a basic MR image segmentation algorithm and a method based on atlas registration and pattern recognition (AT&PR).
Eleven patients each underwent a whole-body PET/CT study and a separate multibed whole-body MRI study. The MR image segmentation algorithm uses a combination of image thresholds, Dixon fat-water segmentation, and component analysis to detect the lungs. MR images are segmented into 5 tissue classes (not including bone), and each class is assigned a default linear attenuation value. The AT&PR algorithm uses a database of previously aligned pairs of MRI/CT image volumes. For each patient, these pairs are registered to the patient MRI volume, and machine-learning techniques are used to predict attenuation values on a continuous scale. MRAC methods are compared via the quantitative analysis of AC PET images using volumes of interest in normal organs and on lesions. We assume the PET/CT values after CT-based AC to be the reference standard.
In regions of normal physiologic uptake, the average error of the mean standardized uptake value was 14.1% ± 10.2% and 7.7% ± 8.4% for the segmentation and the AT&PR methods, respectively. Lesion-based errors were 7.5% ± 7.9% for the segmentation method and 5.7% ± 4.7% for the AT&PR method.
The MRAC method using AT&PR provided better overall PET quantification accuracy than the basic MR image segmentation approach. This better quantification was due to the significantly reduced volume of errors made regarding volumes of interest within or near bones and the slightly reduced volume of errors made regarding areas outside the lungs.
External Publication Status:published
Document Type:Article
Communicated by:Heide Klooz
Affiliations:MPI für Intelligente Systeme/Abt. Schölkopf
The scope and number of records on eDoc is subject to the collection policies defined by each institute - see "info" button in the collection browse view.