Home News About Us Contact Contributors Disclaimer Privacy Policy Help FAQ

Home
Search
Quick Search
Advanced
Fulltext
Browse
Collections
Persons
My eDoc
Session History
Login
Name:
Password:
Documentation
Help
Support Wiki
Direct access to
document ID:


          Institute: MPI für Astronomie     Collection: Publikationen_mpia     Display Documents



ID: 731561.0, MPI für Astronomie / Publikationen_mpia
The AGORA High-resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project. II. Isolated Disk Test
Authors:Kim, J.-h.; Agertz, O.; Teyssier, R.; Butler, M. J.; Ceverino, D.; Choi, J.-H.; Feldmann, R.; Keller, B. W.; Lupi, A.; Quinn, T.; Revaz, Y.; Wallace, S.; Gnedin, N. Y.; Leitner, S. N.; Shen, S.; Smith, B. D.; Thompson, R.; Turk, M. J.; Abel, T.; Arraki, K. S.; Benincasa, S. M.; Chakrabarti, S.; DeGraf, C.; Dekel, A.; Goldbaum, N. J.; Hopkins, P. F.; Hummels, C. B.; Klypin, A.; Li, H.; Madau, P.; Mandelker, N.; Mayer, L.; Nagamine, K.; Nickerson, S.; O'Shea, B. W.; Primack, J. R.; Roca-Fàbrega, S.; Semenov, V.; Shimizu, I.; Simpson, C. M.; Todoroki, K.; Wadsley, J. W.; Wise, J. H.; Collaboration, A.
Date of Publication (YYYY-MM-DD):2016
Title of Journal:The Astrophysical Journal
Volume:833
Issue / Number:2
Start Page:id. 202 (34 pp)
Audience:Not Specified
Abstract / Description:Using an isolated Milky Way-mass galaxy simulation, we compare results from nine state-of-the-art gravito-hydrodynamics codes widely used in the numerical community. We utilize the infrastructure we have built for the AGORA High-resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project. This includes the common disk initial conditions, common physics models (e.g., radiative cooling and UV background by the standardized package Grackle) and common analysis toolkit yt, all of which are publicly available. Subgrid physics models such as Jeans pressure floor, star formation, supernova feedback energy, and metal production are carefully constrained across code platforms. With numerical accuracy that resolves the disk scale height, we find that the codes overall agree well with one another in many dimensions including: gas and stellar surface densities, rotation curves, velocity dispersions, density and temperature distribution functions, disk vertical heights, stellar clumps, star formation rates, and Kennicutt-Schmidt relations. Quantities such as velocity dispersions are very robust (agreement within a few tens of percent at all radii) while measures like newly formed stellar clump mass functions show more significant variation (difference by up to a factor of ˜3). Systematic differences exist, for example, between mesh-based and particle-based codes in the low-density region, and between more diffusive and less diffusive schemes in the high-density tail of the density distribution. Yet intrinsic code differences are generally small compared to the variations in numerical implementations of the common subgrid physics such as supernova feedback. Our experiment reassures that, if adequately designed in accordance with our proposed common parameters, results of a modern high-resolution galaxy formation simulation are more sensitive to input physics than to intrinsic differences in numerical schemes.
Free Keywords:cosmology: theory; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; ISM: structure; methods: numerical
External Publication Status:published
Document Type:Article
Communicated by:N. N.
Affiliations:MPI für Astronomie
Identifiers:ISSN:0004-637X %R 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/202
URL:http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833..202K
The scope and number of records on eDoc is subject to the collection policies defined by each institute - see "info" button in the collection browse view.