Home News About Us Contact Contributors Disclaimer Privacy Policy Help FAQ

Home
Search
Quick Search
Advanced
Fulltext
Browse
Collections
Persons
My eDoc
Login
Name:
Password:
Documentation
Help
Support Wiki
Direct access to
document ID:


          Document History for Document ID 174039

Back to latest document version
Document Version Version Comment Date Status
174039.0 [No comment] 27.03.2011 11:06 Released

ID: 174039.0, MPI für Meteorologie / Atmosphere in the Earth System
Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models
Authors:Emmons, L. K.; Hess, P.; Klonecki, A.; Tie, X.; Horowitz, L.; Lamarque, J. F.; Kinnison, D.; Brasseur, Guy; Atlas, E.; Browell, E.; Cantrell, C.; Eisele, F.; Mauldin, R. L.; Merrill, J.; Ridley, B.; Shetter, R.
Language:English
Date of Publication (YYYY-MM-DD):2003-04-26
Title of Journal:Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres
Journal Abbrev.:J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.
Volume:108
Issue / Number:D8
Sequence Number of Article:8372
Review Status:Peer-review
Audience:Not Specified
Abstract / Description:The tropospheric ozone budget during the Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) campaign has been studied using two chemical transport models ( CTMs): HANK and the Model of Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 2 (MOZART-2). The two models have similar chemical schemes but use different meteorological fields, with HANK using MM5 (Pennsylvania State University, National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Modeling System) and MOZART-2 driven by European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) fields. Both models simulate ozone in good agreement with the observations but underestimate NOx. The models indicate that in the troposphere, averaged over the northern middle and high latitudes, chemical production of ozone drives the increase of ozone seen in the spring. Both ozone gross chemical production and loss increase greatly over the spring months. The in situ production is much larger than the net stratospheric input, and the deposition and horizontal fluxes are relatively small in comparison to chemical destruction. The net production depends sensitively on the concentrations of H2O, HO2 and NO, which differ slightly in the two models. Both models underestimate the chemical production calculated in a steady state model using TOPSE measurements, but the chemical loss rates agree well. Measures of the stratospheric influence on tropospheric ozone in relation to in situ ozone production are discussed. Two different estimates of the stratospheric fraction of O-3 in the Northern Hemisphere troposphere indicate it decreases from 30-50% in February to 15-30% in June. A sensitivity study of the effect of a perturbation in the vertical flux on tropospheric ozone indicates the contribution from the stratosphere is approximately 15%.
Comment of the Author/Creator:Date: 2003, APR 26
External Publication Status:published
Document Type:Article
Communicated by:Carola Kauhs
Affiliations:MPI für Meteorologie/Atmosphere in the Earth System
External Affiliations:Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Div Atmospher Chem, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.; Princeton Univ, NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ 08542 USA.; Max Planck Inst Meteorol, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.; NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA.; Univ Rhode Isl, Grad Sch Oceanog, Ctr Atmospher Chem Studies, Narragansett, RI 02882 USA.
Identifiers:ISI:000182843700001
ISSN:0148-0227
DOI:10.1029/2002JD002665